<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8230;looking at &quot;The Quilting Frolic.&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic</link>
	<description>Comics, Cartoons, Computers, and Cultural History...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Glazner</title>
		<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Glazner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 12:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leisurelyhistorian.net/?p=15#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I am trying to establish the existence of pheasant feathers as decorative items. Prior to 1840</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to establish the existence of pheasant feathers as decorative items. Prior to 1840</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/comment-page-1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leisurelyhistorian.net/?p=15#comment-32</guid>
		<description>the most interesting possession in this painting is the slaves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the most interesting possession in this painting is the slaves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Leisurely Historian&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Confessions of a Stats Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>The Leisurely Historian&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Confessions of a Stats Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 22:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leisurelyhistorian.net/?p=15#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] Play Ukulele.&#8221; At this rate, it&#8217;ll quickly out pace my all-time most-viewed post, a mini-essay on the china and china cabinet in John Lewis Krimmel&#8217;s &#8220;The Quilting Frolic.... This has gotten me thinking. I&#8217;m shocked that an ukulele post generated such interest&#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Play Ukulele.&#8221; At this rate, it&#8217;ll quickly out pace my all-time most-viewed post, a mini-essay on the china and china cabinet in John Lewis Krimmel&#8217;s &#8220;The Quilting Frolic&#8230;. This has gotten me thinking. I&#8217;m shocked that an ukulele post generated such interest&#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/comment-page-1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leisurelyhistorian.net/?p=15#comment-30</guid>
		<description>...as an aside, this assignment is very much like the one assigned in the Jacques&#039; class (that awful, weekly, three hours of absolute silence which you wisely took with Jim Green instead)... thanks for the memories...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;as an aside, this assignment is very much like the one assigned in the Jacques&#8217; class (that awful, weekly, three hours of absolute silence which you wisely took with Jim Green instead)&#8230; thanks for the memories&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 05:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leisurelyhistorian.net/?p=15#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Tad -- lovely entry, I was curious how your china cabinet analysis would turn out. Have you been to the PEM? I enjoy it immensely -- and it definitely has heaps of china. When I was in elementary school I went on a special field trip that took us to the storage rooms and we got to see real shrunken heads, which has forever endeared me to that museum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tad &#8212; lovely entry, I was curious how your china cabinet analysis would turn out. Have you been to the PEM? I enjoy it immensely &#8212; and it definitely has heaps of china. When I was in elementary school I went on a special field trip that took us to the storage rooms and we got to see real shrunken heads, which has forever endeared me to that museum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey Haugan</title>
		<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Audrey Haugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leisurelyhistorian.net/?p=15#comment-28</guid>
		<description>The plot thickens! I just re-examined Krimmel&#039;s &quot;Country Wedding,&quot; and there are no glass panes in the china cabinet! It&#039;s turned sideways---so there&#039;s no reason for Krimmel to use it as a vehicle for displaying material goods in the painting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plot thickens! I just re-examined Krimmel&#8217;s &#8220;Country Wedding,&#8221; and there are no glass panes in the china cabinet! It&#8217;s turned sideways&#8212;so there&#8217;s no reason for Krimmel to use it as a vehicle for displaying material goods in the painting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey Haugan</title>
		<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/comment-page-1#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Audrey Haugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leisurelyhistorian.net/?p=15#comment-27</guid>
		<description>TYPO ALERT AND POSSIBLE FREUDIAN SLIP!
See and correct the phrase in my comment above: &quot;Boston&#039;s purple pains.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TYPO ALERT AND POSSIBLE FREUDIAN SLIP!<br />
See and correct the phrase in my comment above: &#8220;Boston&#8217;s purple pains.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey Haugan</title>
		<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Audrey Haugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leisurelyhistorian.net/?p=15#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I apologize for writing a comment as long as a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologize for writing a comment as long as a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey Haugan</title>
		<link>http://www.leisurelyhistorian.net/looking-at-the-quilting-frolic/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Audrey Haugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leisurelyhistorian.net/?p=15#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Tad, I always look forward to your blog because it&#039;s always so interesting...and I  learn so much (like Anastasia, I also enjoy your writing style).

One particularly interesting observation you made was that the noontime meal used to be the important one. I believe this is still the case in Germany (Marty, am I right?), and a light dinner is preferred. Another observation (personal, like Mark interjected): I was brought up in the city with ex-rural parents and what we all call lunch now was referred to as dinner. Our present-day dinner my family called supper. This caused me great confusion when I went to college and mealtimes were turned upside down.

Interesting how the agricultural at-home to urban job away-from-home transition could affect the elevation of the evening meal. Healthwise, I believe this is proven to encourage obesity; much healthier to eat the heavy meal mid-day.

OK, and now to the china cabinet. I was surprised that such a plain piece like the one in Krimmel&#039;s painting would have glass windows; I found this an anomaly. I would have guessed the piece would be what country folk might have called a cupboard, but the glass belies that. You&#039;re right, I think it would ordinarily have been in the kitchen, especially since it was not ornate. Maybe Krimmel went against the grain and added glass ONLY so he could cram even more displayed material goods into the painting.
AND moved it out of the kitchen just so we could see it in the painting.

Hmmm....I just consulted my Bulfinch Illustrated Encyclopedia of Antiques. There is no category in the index for the term &quot;china cabinet.&quot;  Under &quot;cabinet,&quot; it says &quot;cupboard with drawers and shelves for storing or displaying precious items, often highly decorated with inlay and ornamental features.&quot; That leads me to further speculate that Krimmel purposely added the glass panes (especially since you emphasized how expensive they would be).

Lastly, Tad, I want to thank you for all your insightful comments (especially those on my blog).

Several P.S.&#039;s.  (1) Interesting about Boston&#039;s purple pains. (2) It is considered chic and/or charming in decorating magazines today to have mismatched/eclectic dinnerware (what goes around comes around). (3) For those of you who read Tad&#039;s blog and this comment, don&#039;t forget to click on his links to see his photo album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tad, I always look forward to your blog because it&#8217;s always so interesting&#8230;and I  learn so much (like Anastasia, I also enjoy your writing style).</p>
<p>One particularly interesting observation you made was that the noontime meal used to be the important one. I believe this is still the case in Germany (Marty, am I right?), and a light dinner is preferred. Another observation (personal, like Mark interjected): I was brought up in the city with ex-rural parents and what we all call lunch now was referred to as dinner. Our present-day dinner my family called supper. This caused me great confusion when I went to college and mealtimes were turned upside down.</p>
<p>Interesting how the agricultural at-home to urban job away-from-home transition could affect the elevation of the evening meal. Healthwise, I believe this is proven to encourage obesity; much healthier to eat the heavy meal mid-day.</p>
<p>OK, and now to the china cabinet. I was surprised that such a plain piece like the one in Krimmel&#8217;s painting would have glass windows; I found this an anomaly. I would have guessed the piece would be what country folk might have called a cupboard, but the glass belies that. You&#8217;re right, I think it would ordinarily have been in the kitchen, especially since it was not ornate. Maybe Krimmel went against the grain and added glass ONLY so he could cram even more displayed material goods into the painting.<br />
AND moved it out of the kitchen just so we could see it in the painting.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;.I just consulted my Bulfinch Illustrated Encyclopedia of Antiques. There is no category in the index for the term &#8220;china cabinet.&#8221;  Under &#8220;cabinet,&#8221; it says &#8220;cupboard with drawers and shelves for storing or displaying precious items, often highly decorated with inlay and ornamental features.&#8221; That leads me to further speculate that Krimmel purposely added the glass panes (especially since you emphasized how expensive they would be).</p>
<p>Lastly, Tad, I want to thank you for all your insightful comments (especially those on my blog).</p>
<p>Several P.S.&#8217;s.  (1) Interesting about Boston&#8217;s purple pains. (2) It is considered chic and/or charming in decorating magazines today to have mismatched/eclectic dinnerware (what goes around comes around). (3) For those of you who read Tad&#8217;s blog and this comment, don&#8217;t forget to click on his links to see his photo album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

